Skip to main content
· 8/5/2009

Valdez v. Hulihan

Citations

  • 640 F. Supp. 2d 514
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71083
  • 2009 WL 2431942

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that once a petitioner’s sentence has expired he or she is no longer “in custody” under that conviction, “even when the possibility exists that the conviction may be used to enhance a future sentence”
  • {O|nce a sentence has been completely served and thus expired, an individual is no longer ‘in custody’ under that conviction, even when the possibility exists that the conviction may be used to enhance a future sentence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Victor Marrero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.