Skip to main content
· 8/16/1989

Valdez v. City And County Of Denver

Citations

  • 878 F.2d 1285

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that law enforcement officials enjoy absolute immunity from suit for performing ministerial actions under the direction of a state court judge
  • holding that “an official charged with the duty of executing a facially valid court order enjoys absolute immunity from liability for damages in a suit challenging conduct prescribed by that order”
  • observing that absolute immunity for officials assigned to carry out a judge’s orders is necessary to ensure that such officials can perform their function without the need to secure permanent legal counsel
  • \[public] [o]fficials such as the defendants must not be required to act as pseudo-appellate courts scrutinizing the orders of judges\
  • under qualified immunity standard, \[f]actual disputes would require discovery if not a trial\
  • under qualified immunity standard, “[fjactual disputes would require discovery if not a trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.