Skip to main content
· 12/4/1979

Valadzic v. Briggs & Stratton Corp.

Citations

  • 286 N.W.2d 540
  • 92 Wis. 2d 583
  • 1979 Wisc. LEXIS 2204

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “[a] general finding by [an agency] implies all facts necessary to support it” and that findings “may be inferred from other properly made findings” or other evidence
  • an agency's findings regarding expert testimony are conclusive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shirley S. Abrahamson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.