Vaizburd v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[i]n the absence of special proof that a rate other than [the DTA rate] is appropriate, [the court] use[s the DTA] rate” to assess interest on damages resulting from the government’s “deposition of sand on plaintiffs’ property”
• determining that “[i]n the absence of special proof that a rate other than [the DTA rate] is appropriate, [the court] use[s the DTA] rate” to assess interest on an award of just compensation resulting from the government’s “deposition of sand on plaintiffs’ property”
• “Compounding we view as a routine means by which a reasonable person would protect themselves, over an extended period of time, from erosion of their investment.”
• “the ‘cost of cure’ approach to recovery in a takings case is an alternative to computing damages through diminished market value”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Vaizburd v. United States

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Vaizburd v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2000-03-17· cited 11×
• Vaizburd v. United States
  E.D. New York· 2000-02-03· cited 9×
• Vaizburd v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2003-06-30· cited 7×
• Vaizburd v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2004-10-01