Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Federal Claims· 8/30/2005

Vaizburd v. United States

Citations

  • 67 Fed. Cl. 499
  • 2005 WL 2100904

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[i]n the absence of special proof that a rate other than [the DTA rate] is appropriate, [the court] use[s the DTA] rate” to assess interest on damages resulting from the government’s “deposition of sand on plaintiffs’ property”
  • determining that “[i]n the absence of special proof that a rate other than [the DTA rate] is appropriate, [the court] use[s the DTA] rate” to assess interest on an award of just compensation resulting from the government’s “deposition of sand on plaintiffs’ property”
  • “Compounding we view as a routine means by which a reasonable person would protect themselves, over an extended period of time, from erosion of their investment.”
  • “the ‘cost of cure’ approach to recovery in a takings case is an alternative to computing damages through diminished market value”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bruggink

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Vaizburd v. United States

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.