Skip to main content
· 7/21/2008

Vail v. Raybestos Products Co.

Citations

  • 533 F.3d 904
  • 13 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1537
  • 184 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2718
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 15384
  • 2008 WL 2791672

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]n employer can defeat an interference claim by showing, among other things, that the employee did not take leave for the intended purpose.”
  • observation that employee mowed lawns on a morning that she took FMLA leave for a migraine supported employer’s honest suspicion defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Flaum, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.