Vail v. Marshall Motor Co.
Citations
- 107 Kan. 290
- 191 P. 579
- 1920 Kan. LEXIS 61
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Automobile Accident. The rule of Howard v. Motor Co., 106 Kan. 775, 190 Pac. 11, followed.</p> <p>2. Same — Automobile Negligently Driven by Employee — Liability of Employer — Evidence. The evidence examined, and held to be sufficient to support the findings and verdict of the jury to the effect that the driver of the automobile which caused injury to the plaintiffs, was engaged in the service of the defendants at the time, and that the injuries were sustained through the culpable negligence of the defendants.</p>
Judges: Johnston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.