· 8/12/1993
Vail v. Employees' Retirement System of Hawai'i
Citations
- 856 P.2d 1227
- 75 Haw. 42
- 1993 Haw. LEXIS 31
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the statute of limitations contained in HRS § 661-5 was applicable to the plaintiff's claim founded upon a state statute, HRS § 88-42 (1993)
- concluding that the statute of limitations contained in HRS § 661-5 was applicable to the plaintiffs claim founded upon a state statute, HRS § 88-42 (1993)
- entertaining an appeal, brought pursuant to HRS § 91-14, of an HRS § 91-8 declaratory order
- disposing of an appeal, brought pursuant to HRS § 91-14, of a HRS § 91-8 declaratory order
- entertaining an appeal, brought pursuant to HRS § 91-14, of an HRS § 91-8 declaratory order
- disposing of an appeal, brought pursuant to HRS § 91-14, of a HRS § 91-8 declaratory order
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moon, Klein, Levinson, Nakayama, Milks, Place, Ramil
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.