Skip to main content
· 8/12/1993

Vail v. Employees' Retirement System of Hawai'i

Citations

  • 856 P.2d 1227
  • 75 Haw. 42
  • 1993 Haw. LEXIS 31

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the statute of limitations contained in HRS § 661-5 was applicable to the plaintiff's claim founded upon a state statute, HRS § 88-42 (1993)
  • concluding that the statute of limitations contained in HRS § 661-5 was applicable to the plaintiffs claim founded upon a state statute, HRS § 88-42 (1993)
  • entertaining an appeal, brought pursuant to HRS § 91-14, of an HRS § 91-8 declaratory order
  • disposing of an appeal, brought pursuant to HRS § 91-14, of a HRS § 91-8 declaratory order
  • entertaining an appeal, brought pursuant to HRS § 91-14, of an HRS § 91-8 declaratory order
  • disposing of an appeal, brought pursuant to HRS § 91-14, of a HRS § 91-8 declaratory order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Klein, Levinson, Nakayama, Milks, Place, Ramil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.