Skip to main content
· 3/15/1869

Vail v. Dinning

Citations

  • 44 Mo. 210

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the use of a PowerPoint presentation during opening statement that includes a slide of the defendant's booking photograph with the word \GUILTY\ written across it is error as it undermines the presumption of innocence
  • observing that the opening statement serves to state the issues and evidence to be presented
  • providing that the opening statement should be limited to the evidence the State intends to offer and believes to be admissible
  • explaining that opening statements provide an opportunity to outline the evidence to be presented, not for argument
  • providing that opening statement should set forth evidence believed in good faith to be available and admissible and reviewing challenges to opening statement for abuse of discretion
  • providing that opening statement should set forth evidence believed in good faith to be available and admissible and reviewing challenges to opening statement for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Other, Wagner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.