Vail v. City of Attica

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the purpose of a reconsideration motion “is not to allow a party to simply change[ ] theories and [try] again, thus giving them a second bite at the apple” (quotation omitted)
• “The purpose of a motion for reconsideration . . . is not to allow a party to simply change theories and try again, thus giving them a second bite at the apple.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).