· 6/4/1976
Vadnais v. American Family Mutual Insurance
Citations
- 243 N.W.2d 45
- 309 Minn. 97
- 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1505
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a district court may not “order a new trial on the basis of suspected jury prejudice in the absence of evidence of alleged misconduct or an excessive or insufficient damage award”
- reversing the district court’s order granting a new trial based on passion or prejudice where it appeared that the district court only speculated as to the possibility of prejudice because specific examples or instances of prejudice were not cited in the record
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, MacLaughlin, Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.