Skip to main content
· 6/4/1976

Vadnais v. American Family Mutual Insurance

Citations

  • 243 N.W.2d 45
  • 309 Minn. 97
  • 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1505

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a district court may not “order a new trial on the basis of suspected jury prejudice in the absence of evidence of alleged misconduct or an excessive or insufficient damage award”
  • reversing the district court’s order granting a new trial based on passion or prejudice where it appeared that the district court only speculated as to the possibility of prejudice because specific examples or instances of prejudice were not cited in the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, MacLaughlin, Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.