Skip to main content
· 11/27/2006

Vaden v. Lantz

Citations

  • 459 F. Supp. 2d 149
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86600
  • 2006 WL 3422163

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying Rule 12(e) motion where complaint provided sufficient detail, observing that “[f]urther detail as to the nature of the conduct can be obtained through discovery”
  • denying Rule 12(e) motion where complaint provided sufficient detail, observing that “[f]urther detail as to the nature of the conduct can be obtained through discovery”
  • “Such motions are generally disfavored . . . and are not intended to substitute for the normal discovery process.” (internal citation and quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arterton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.