Vaccaro v. Barry Kaiman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “When the defect which justifies striking a complaint is capable of cure, the court should allow leave to amend.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lang v. Hochman
  California Court of Appeal· 2000-01-31· cited 58×
• CLD Construction, Inc. v. City of San Ramon
  California Court of Appeal· 2004-07-23· cited 42×
• Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 2007-04-18· cited 36×
• Carlson v. STATE DEPT. OF FISH AND GAME
  California Court of Appeal· 1998-12-18· cited 30×
• In Re Marriage of Hock & Gordon-Hock
  California Court of Appeal· 2000-05-30· cited 17×
• Hossain v. Hossain
  California Court of Appeal· 2007-11-30· cited 16×
• Hoover v. West Virginia Board of Medicine
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2004-05-28· cited 11×
• Central Concrete Supply Co., Inc. v. Bursak
  California Court of Appeal· 2010-03-11· cited 8×
• Hock v. Gordon-Hock
  California Court of Appeal· 2000-05-30· cited 1×
• Bai v. Yip
  California Court of Appeal· 2024-12-05

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cisneros v. Vueve
  California Court of Appeal· 1995-08-10· cited 39×
• Metropolitan Service Corp. v. Casa De Palms, Ltd.
  California Court of Appeal· 1995-01-31· cited 36×
• Reid v. Balter
  California Court of Appeal· 1993-04-06· cited 36×
• Perlman v. Municipal Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1979-12-11· cited 16×