v. Wright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that requisite cause is measured “at the time [police] initially approach[] the [suspect]” and suspect’s flight after seizure cannot be used in reasonable suspicion calculus
• concluding that there was “no reason at this juncture to embrace a standard other than that adhered to by the United States Supreme Court” for stop and frisk cases
• explaining that “unprovoked flight in a high crime area is sufficient to create a reasonable suspicion to justify [an investigatory] stop under the Fourth Amendment.”
• holding defendant’s unprovoked flight was factor in determining that officer had reasonable suspicion
• declining to depart from Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968) and progeny
• declining to depart from Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968) and progeny

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).