V. V. v. V. V.
Syllabus
The defendant, against whom an order of protection had been issued as to her minor child, appealed to this court from certain postjudgment orders of the trial court. Held that this court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the appeal and, accordingly, the appeal was dismissed; the defen- dant was not aggrieved by the trial court's orders, as her personal and legal interests were not specially and injuriously affected by the orders, the first of which mistakenly characterized the defendant's withdrawal of her pending motions as a withdrawal of the plaintiff's underlying action and was later vacated by the court and the second of which reflected the fact that the defendant's counsel withdrew all of the defen- dant's pending motions at a hearing on the same day. Argued April 11—officially released October 11, 2022
Judges: Prescott; Cradle; Clark
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.