V. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing three situations where we will depart from the Supreme Court’s guidance when interpreting substantially similar language
• refusing to interpret the Minnesota Constitution more broadly than the Fourth Amendment with respect to administrative warrants, in part, because the Supreme Court decision on administrative warrants increased Fourth Amendment protections
• “Administrative search warrants must be supported by probable cause; not individualized suspicion but ‘reasonable legislative or administrative standards for conducting an area inspection.’”
• “Administrative search warrants must be supported by probable cause; not individualized suspicion but ‘reasonable legislative or administrative standards for conducting an area inspection.’”
• \We favor uniformity with the federal constitution because of the primacy of the federal constitution in matters affecting individual liberties and to encourage consistency in constitutional law in state and federal courts.\ (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).