Skip to main content
· 6/8/2001

V & S Vin & Sprit Aktiebolag v. Hanson

Citations

  • 146 F. Supp. 2d 796
  • 60 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1310
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9063
  • 2001 WL 754459

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying motion to dismiss trademark infringement claim on forum non conveniens grounds, in part, because “[c]learly, Plaintiff can only obtain relief under the specific statutes at issue—the Lanham Act and the ACPA—in a U.S. court”
  • “Clearly, Plaintiff can only obtain relief under the specific statutes at issue—the Lanham Act and the ACPA—in a U.S. court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cacheris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.