· 6/8/2001
V & S Vin & Sprit Aktiebolag v. Hanson
Citations
- 146 F. Supp. 2d 796
- 60 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1310
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9063
- 2001 WL 754459
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying motion to dismiss trademark infringement claim on forum non conveniens grounds, in part, because “[c]learly, Plaintiff can only obtain relief under the specific statutes at issue—the Lanham Act and the ACPA—in a U.S. court”
- “Clearly, Plaintiff can only obtain relief under the specific statutes at issue—the Lanham Act and the ACPA—in a U.S. court.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cacheris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.