V. Ray Summers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming defendant was motivated by plaintiffs age and religion but finding after-acquired evidence relevant to “claim of injury”
• assuming discriminatory animus, and therefore finding violation of Title VII, but finding no injury
• “McDonnell Douglas clearly presupposes a ‘legitimate, nondiseriminatory reason’ known to the employer at the time of the employee’s discharge”
• find ing after-acquired evidence relevant to “claim of injury”
• employee did not deny falsifying over 150 records
• removal of records before layoff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).