V. Elizabeth Gini v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defamation alone can never serve as basis for First Amendment retaliation claim under § 1983
• finding that police officers do not have an affirmative duty to investigate crimes in a particular manner or to protect one citizen from another
• explaining that when “federal-law 11 claims are eliminated before trial, the balance of factors ... will point toward declining to exercise 12 jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims”
• stating that dismissal after declining supplemental jurisdiction should be without prejudice
• stating that dismissal after declining supplemental jurisdiction should be without prejudice
• finding 17 no abuse of discretion when declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction for a case that 18 was not “in any way unusual”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).