Skip to main content
· 7/10/1995

Uzzell v. Scully

Citations

  • 893 F. Supp. 259
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9656
  • 1995 WL 431274

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting summary judgment against Plaintiff’s procedural due process claims, noting that “no liberty interest was invoked and thus he was not deprived of procedural due process”
  • 180 days’ disciplinary confinement in a SHU does not implicate a liberty interest under Sandin

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scheindlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.