Utility Reform Project v. Bonneville Power Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]n light of the proper dismissal of the § 1983 claims against the County, the district court should have declined to exercise pendent jurisdiction over [plaintiffs’] state-law claims against the County.”
• “[I]n light of the proper dismissal of the § 1983 claim against the [c]ounty, the district court should have declined to exercise pendent jurisdiction over [the plaintiff’s] state-law claims against the [c]ounty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).