· 1/20/2006
Utility Consumers' Action Network, Inc. v. AT&T Broadband of Southern Cal., Inc.
Citations
- 37 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827
- 135 Cal. App. 4th 1023
- 2006 D.A.R. 800
- 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 630
- 2006 Daily Journal DAR 800
- 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 50
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting argument that liquidated damages provision was void unless specifically negotiated
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rubin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.