Utilities Engineering Institute v. Jarrells

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Lindstrom extends to failure-to-warn claims,- and therefore, “maritime law imposes no duty upon a product manufacturer to warn of the dangers associated with another manufacturer’s ‘product’ (or component part)”
• describing Conner’s interpretation of Lindstrom as “consistent with [the rules set forth under] state law in O’Neil, Simo-netta, and Braaten—decisions which each considered and relied upon Lindstrom in determining its respective rule of law regarding negligent failure-to-warn”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).