Util. L. Rep. P 14,202 Northern Border Pipeline Company v. 86.72 Acres of Land

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a pipeline company could not obtain a preliminary injunction allowing immediate possession of the defendants' properties because it did not first demonstrate a substantive entitlement to immediate possession
• plaintiff only entitled to immediate possession if it has “ownership interest in the property that... was fully vested even before the initiation of the lawsuit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).