Utica Square National Bank of Tulsa v. Woodson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “damages may be measured in several ways”
• requiring a plaintiff claiming fraud under Pennsylvania law to show justifiable reliance and damages
• \[D]amages are most commonly calculated as the difference between the price paid for a security and the security's `true value.' \
• an unregistered stock's lack of transferability \will have an impact on its value\
• invoked supervisory power to require district courts, when granting motion for directed verdict, to set forth explanation sufficient to permit this Court to understand legal premise upon which decision was based
• \The proper measure of damages to reflect the loss proximately caused by the defendants' deceit is the out- of-pocket rule. That rule is the traditional measure of damages in a Rule 10b-5 action.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).