Skip to main content
· 8/6/1991

Utica National Insurance Co. of Texas v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York

Citations

  • 812 S.W.2d 656
  • 1991 WL 118517

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that when both parties move for summary judgment and one motion is granted but the other denied, the appellate court should review the questions presented
  • summarizing another Texas Court of Appeals decision interpreting contract language as a matter of law, which held “in conformity with the majority rule . . . and established practice in the insurance industry” (a
  • court ordered pro-rata contribution to liability where neither of two different lines of insurance acknowledged the existence of the other

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rowe, Lagarde, Ovard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.