Utica Mutual Insurance v. Way of Cross Church of Christ, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “longstanding case law, federal regulations and agency-interpretation on those regulations hold language-based discrimination constitutes a form of national origin discrimination under Title VI”
• “longstanding case law, federal regulations and agency interpretation of those regulations hold language-based discrimination constitutes a form of national origin discrimination under Title VI”
• rejecting defendants’ argument that Mumid supports “their argument that national origin does not cover LEP individuals under Title VI” in part because Mumid fails to address or distinguish Lau
• “DOJ coordinates government-wide compliance with Title VI and its interpretation of Title VI is entitled to special deference.”
• “A 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss challenges the legal sufficiency of the pleadings, not the appropriateness of the relief 22 sought.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).