· 12/11/2015
Uthe Technology Corp. v. Aetrium, Inc.
Citations
- 808 F.3d 755
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 21437
- 2015 WL 8538090
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “the animating purpose of the one satisfaction rule is to prevent double 26 recovery and unjust enrichment”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fernandez, Smith, Scheindlin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.