Utah Republican Party v. Cox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Chairman of the Utah Republican Party sent a letter to the Lieutenant Governor in December 2015 declaring that ‘it would restrict its candidate-selection procedures to the convention method, thereby prohibiting any URP candidate from gathering signatures.’”
• “At present there are multiple options available to the Republican Party once this court’s interpretation of the QPP statute is published, and it is not clearly established in the record which of those the party will choose.”
• “At present there are multiple options available to the Republican Party once this court’s interpretation of the QPP statute is published, and it is not clearly established in the record which of those the party will choose.”
• “The Chairman of the Utah Republican Party sent a letter to the Lieutenant Governor in December 2015 declaring that ‘it would restrict its candidate-selection procedures to the convention method, thereby prohibiting any URP candidate from 42 gathering signatures.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Utah Republican Party v. Cox

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Utah Republican Party v. Cox
  D. Utah· 2016-04-06· cited 7×
• Utah Republican Party v. Cox
  D. Utah· 2016-04-15· cited 5×
• Utah Republican Party v. Cox
  Tenth Circuit· 2018-03-20· cited 4×
• Utah Republican Party v. Cox
  Utah Supreme Court· 2016-04-08
• Utah Republican Party v. Cox
  Supreme Court· 2019-03-04