Utah-Idaho Sugar Co. v. Intermountain Gas Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that final orders of IPUC are generally not subject to collateral attack and should be challenged either by a petition for reconsideration or appeal to this Court in accordance with I.C. § 61-627
• “In reviewing findings of fact we will sustain a Commission’s determination unless it appears that the clear weight of the evidence is against its conclusion or that the evidence is strong and persuasive that the Commission abused its discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).