USF Insurance v. Clarendon America Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding identical excess insurance clauses “cancel one another out” and insurers are required to contribute to loss on pro rated basis
• rejecting equal shares contribution allocation in favor of time on the risk because one coinsurer covered insured for only three months while two others provided coverage for twelve months

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).