Usala v. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the Plaintiff's driving limitations do not impeded a major life activity and noting that \the [Second Circuit] has held that driving is not a 'major life activity' under the ADA\ (citing Colwell , 158 F.3d at 643 )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).