Skip to main content
· 9/20/1993

USAA Property & Casualty Insurance v. Rowland

Citations

  • 435 S.E.2d 879
  • 312 S.C. 536
  • 1993 S.C. App. LEXIS 159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding when a term is not defined in an insurance policy, the court should define the term according to the usual understanding of the term’s significance to the normal person
  • absent prescribed definition in policy, “accident” must be defined according to ordinary and usual understanding
  • “In the absence of a prescribed definition in the policy, the term should be defined according to the ordinary and usual understanding of the term’s significance to the ordinary person.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goolsby, Howell, Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.