Usaa Group v. Universal Alarms, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting claim that individuals who contracted with alarm company were in a proeedurally unconscionable bargaining position, since other alarm systems, even if different in type, were available to the plaintiffs
• “We are not aware of any limitations preventing the Muellers from obtaining a central monitoring arrangement from another source or from obtaining some other protection system, such as a noise-generating system or a sprinkler system.”
• limitation of $250 not substantively unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).