USAA Cas. Ins. Co. v. Gordon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that without a severability clause an exclusion applying to the conduct of “any insured” creates a joint obligation
• finding that “the bifurcated structure of the ... policy and the conspicuous absence of a sever-ability clause in Section I unambiguously reflects its purposeful omission from that section.”
• “We have no trouble concluding that exclusion (h), which excludes coverage for damage caused by ‘any insured,’ unambiguously results in joint property coverage in this case.”
• “We have no trouble concluding that exclusion (h), which excludes coverage for damage caused by ‘any insured‘, unambiguously results in joint property coverage in this case.” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).