Skip to main content
· 8/21/2008

USA Waste of Maryland, Inc. v. Love

Citations

  • 954 A.2d 1027
  • 28 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 376
  • 2008 D.C. App. LEXIS 378
  • 2008 WL 3861464

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that when \a worker [has] more than one employer at the same time ... both employers are obligated to provide the employee with workers' compensation coverage\
  • stating that when “a worker [has] more than one employer at the same time . . . both employers are obligated to provide the employee with workers’ compensation coverage”
  • “Under the workers’ compensation laws of Maryland and the District of Columbia, a worker may have more than one employer at the same time.”
  • \A conflict of laws does not exist when the laws of the different jurisdictions are identical or would produce the identical result on the facts presented.\
  • \A conflict of laws does not exist when the laws of the different jurisdictions are identical or would produce the identical result on the facts presented.\
  • \A conflict of laws does not exist when the laws of the different jurisdictions are identical or would produce the identical result on the facts presented.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glickman, Blackburne-Rigsby, Steadman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.