USA v. Alabama Power Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “vigorous cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof are the traditional and appropriate means of attacking shaky but admissible evidence” (quoting Allison, 184 F.3d at 1311–12)
• distinguishing the Court’s role as gatekeeper from the jury’s role as factfinder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).