Usa Machinery Corporation v. Csc, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an agreement to negotiate in good faith is only enforceable where, as in Channel Home, the parties manifested an intent to be bound to that agreement
• “Because the parties appear to be in agreement on [the choice-of-law] issue, we will assume, without deciding, that Pennsylvania law supplies the appropriate substantive rules.”
• “Because the parties appear to be in agreement on this issue, we will assume, without deciding, that Pennsylvania law supplies the appropriate substantive rules.”
• “Because the parties appear to be in agreement on this issue, we will assume, without deciding, that Pennsylvania law supplies the appropriate substantive rules.”
• “Because the parties appear to be in agreement on th[e choice-of-law] issue, [the court] will assume, without deciding, that [the agreed-upon] law supplies the appropriate substantive rules.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).