· 10/11/2016
USA Gymnastics, Inc. D/B/A USA Gymnastics v. Jane Doe
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that credibility challenges go to the weight, not the sufficiency of the evidence
- holding evidence of identity as the person who used a computer to view child pornography was sufficient despite testimony that other members of the household also had access to the device
- applying Laboy to reach an issue set forth in a “boilerplate” concise statement where the trial court readily apprehended the issue
- addressing claim, despite the potential waiver for a non-compliant Rule 1925(b) statement, because the trial court could “readily apprehend” the issue
- addressing claim, despite the potential waiver for a non-compliant Rule 1925(b) statement, because the trial court could “readily apprehend” the issue
- applying Laboy to reach an issue set forth in a “boilerplate” concise statement where the trial court readily apprehended the issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.