Skip to main content
· 4/13/2006

US Xpress v. Taxation and Revenue Dept.

Citations

  • 136 P.3d 999
  • 139 N.M. 589
  • 2006 NMSC 017

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting \a taxpayer\ and \the taxpayer\ in New Mexico refund statute require individual claims as prerequisite to appellate jurisdiction
  • noting “a taxpayer” and “the taxpayer” in New Mexico refund statute require individual claims as prerequisite to appellate jurisdiction
  • refusing to allow vicarious exhaustion under a statute whose plain meaning required individual plaintiffs to exhaust administrative remedies
  • refusing to allow vicarious exhaustion under a statute whose plain meaning required individual plaintiffs to exhaust administrative remedies
  • noting \a taxpayer\ and \the taxpayer\ in refund statute require individual claims
  • noting “a taxpayer” and “the taxpayer” in refund statute require individual claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chávez, Bosson, Minzner, Serna, Maes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.