· 4/13/2006
US Xpress v. Taxation and Revenue Dept.
Citations
- 136 P.3d 999
- 139 N.M. 589
- 2006 NMSC 017
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting \a taxpayer\ and \the taxpayer\ in New Mexico refund statute require individual claims as prerequisite to appellate jurisdiction
- noting “a taxpayer” and “the taxpayer” in New Mexico refund statute require individual claims as prerequisite to appellate jurisdiction
- refusing to allow vicarious exhaustion under a statute whose plain meaning required individual plaintiffs to exhaust administrative remedies
- refusing to allow vicarious exhaustion under a statute whose plain meaning required individual plaintiffs to exhaust administrative remedies
- noting \a taxpayer\ and \the taxpayer\ in refund statute require individual claims
- noting “a taxpayer” and “the taxpayer” in refund statute require individual claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chávez, Bosson, Minzner, Serna, Maes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.