U.S. West Inc. v. Tristani

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “any chilling effect [a] statute may have on [a party’s] First Amendment rights counsels in favor of ripeness”
• explaining that “any chilling effect [a] statute may have on [a party’s] First Amendment rights counsels in favor of ripeness”
• asserting First and Fifth Amendment challenges to rate order of the New Mexico State Corporation Commission
• explaining the Johnson Act is designed to keep rate challenges out of federal courts “lock, stock, and barrel”
• applying the Johnson Act to utility’s claim that state’s consideration of subsidiary’s advertising revenue in rate calculation violated the utility’s freedom of expression and constituted an uncompensated taking
• “Interference requires more than an incidental effect on interstate commerce.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).