Skip to main content
· 4/30/1996

US TAXPAYERS PARTY v. Garza

Citations

  • 924 F. Supp. 71
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5960
  • 1996 WL 220742

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • identifying a number of important interests served by section 162.015 in affirming the constitutionality of the “sore loser” provisions of the statute
  • recognizing Texas’s interest in preventing voter confusion in sore-loser statute
  • section 162.015 “is a reasonable, nondiscriminatory restriction that protects the integrity and reliability of the electoral process”
  • finding the same for Texas’s sore loser statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nowlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.