U.S. Security Insurance Co. v. Contreras

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that five week break between two sex crimes was not too remote
• determining that witness has two chances to invoke privilege—before and after in camera review—and if privilege is invoked, testimony is stricken
• setting forth procedure by which confidential records can be disclosed to parties
• shared marks of similarity is a significant factor when theory of admissibility is common scheme
• “[t]he capacity of a witness to observe, recollect and narrate an occurrence is a proper subject of inquiry on cross-examination”
• upon a showing of necessity, the accused may gain access to privileged information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).