U.S. Ring Binder L.P. v. World Wide Stationery Manufacturing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding factor six weighed in favor of the requested fee award where “class counsel spent more than 40,000 hours over the course of more than four years litigating th[e] case”
• approving plan of allocation as fair, reasonable, and adequate where, in antitrust action against brand name drug manufacturer, each class member receives their pro rata share of the net settlement fund, based on their share of qualifying purchases of the brand name drug
• approving plan of allocation as fair, reasonable, and adequate where, in antitrust action against brand name drug manufacturer, each class member receives their pro rata share of the net settlement fund, based on their share of qualifying purchases of the brand name drug
• “Antitrust class actions are particularly complex to litigate and therefore quite expensive.”
• “Antitrust class actions are particularly complex to litigate and therefore quite expensive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).