Skip to main content
· 1/12/2010

U.S. Philips Corp. v. KBC Bank N.V.

Citations

  • 590 F.3d 1091
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 692
  • 2010 WL 92480

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A preliminary injunction . . . dissolves ipso facto when a final judgment is entered in the cause.”
  • “A preliminary injunction imposed according to the procedures outlined in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 dissolves ipso facto when a final judgment is entered in the cause.”
  • “A preliminary injunction imposed according to the procedures outlined in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 dissolves ipso facto when a final judgment is entered in the cause.”
  • “A preliminary injunction imposed according to the procedures outlined in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 dissolves ipso facto when a final judgment is entered in the cause.”
  • “A preliminary injunction imposed according to the procedures outlined in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 dissolves ipso facto when a final judgment is entered in the cause.”
  • “This principle stems from the 9 very purpose of a preliminary injunction, which is to preserve the status quo and the 10 rights of the parties until a final judgment issues in the cause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ronald M. Gould and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges, and Donald W. Molloy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.