Skip to main content
· 9/21/2005

U.S. Philips Corp. v. International Trade Commission

Citations

  • 424 F.3d 1179
  • 76 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1545
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 20202
  • 2005 WL 2293081

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the propriety of a license generally must be evaluated as of the time when it is issued
  • explaining that the propriety of a license generally must be evaluated as of the time when it is issued
  • “Package licensing can also obviate any potential patent disputes ... and thus reduce the likelihood that a licensee will find itself involved in costly litigation.”
  • \Package licensing can also obviate any potential patent disputes ... and thus reduce the likelihood that a licensee will find itself involved in costly litigation.\
  • \A nonexclusive patent license is simply a promise not to sue for infringement.\
  • “A nonexclusive patent license is simply a promise not to sue for infringement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryson, Gajarsa, Linn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.