Skip to main content
· 4/4/1989

U.S. Parking Systems v. City of Phoenix

Citations

  • 772 P.2d 33
  • 160 Ariz. 210
  • 31 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 66
  • 1989 Ariz. App. LEXIS 93

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating we need not defer to a board of adjustment’s interpretation when “there is no showing of a long-standing interpretation by the agency”
  • “Where a term 28 is used in one provision of a statute and omitted from another, that term should not be read 1 into the section where it is omitted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hathaway, Livermore, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.