· 4/4/1989
U.S. Parking Systems v. City of Phoenix
Citations
- 772 P.2d 33
- 160 Ariz. 210
- 31 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 66
- 1989 Ariz. App. LEXIS 93
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating we need not defer to a board of adjustment’s interpretation when “there is no showing of a long-standing interpretation by the agency”
- “Where a term 28 is used in one provision of a statute and omitted from another, that term should not be read 1 into the section where it is omitted.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hathaway, Livermore, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.