Skip to main content
· 10/19/2009

U.S. Foodservice, Inc. v. Bartow County Bank

Citations

  • 685 S.E.2d 777
  • 300 Ga. App. 519
  • 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 3382
  • 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 1214

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying 20/20 Vision Center , supra, in resolving appeal from denial of summary judgment, where complaint did not expressly set forth promissory estoppel argument but did allege facts that, if proved, could entitle plaintiff to relief under that doctrine
  • “[Plaintiffs] promissory estoppel argument fails because there is no evidence that injustice can be avoided only by the enforcement of the promise.”
  • because defendant \did argue elements of promissory estoppel\ in its summary judgment opposition brief, we could consider on appeal the merits of the promissory estoppel argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Phipps, Smith, Bernes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.