US Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. Romay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he insured must comply with all of the policy’s post-loss obligations before the appraisal clause is triggered”
• holding in 1999 that, “The insured must comply with all of the policy’s post-loss obligations before the appraisal clause is triggered.”
• holding that the “disagreement necessary to trigger appraisal cannot be unilateral”
• \No reasonable and thoughtful interpretation of the policy could support compelling appraisal without first complying with the post-loss obligations.\
• “If you and we fail to agree on the amount of loss, either may demand an appraisal of the loss ... ”
• provision requiring claimant to submit sworn proof of loss is a condition precedent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).