US Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Warwick Dev. Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that faulty workmanship claim did not describe “occurrence” defined under a CGL policy as “an accident, including continuous or repeated exposure to conditions, which results in bodily injury or property damage neither expected nor intended from the standpoint of the Insured”
• Supreme Court of Alabama held that a misrepresentation was not considered an occurrence, and even if it were considered an occurrence then the misrepresentation did not cause the property damage.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).