Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a TCPA claim is an unassignable personal claim
• following Gottlieb in concluding that, “absent an explicit indication that Congress intended to create an exception to diversity jurisdiction, one may not be created by implication” and finding no such explicit indication in the TCPA
• “ ‘[I]f otherwise permitted by the laws or rules of a court of a State’ implies that federal [question or diversity] jurisdiction ... is available; otherwise where would victims go if a state elected not to entertain these suits?”
• \`[I]f otherwise permitted by the laws or rules of a court of a State' implies that federal [question or diversity] jurisdiction ... is available; otherwise where would victims go if a state elected not to entertain these suits?\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).